No.43858
first you'd have to tag every single AI generated post on the site just to make it possible.
Nobody wants to waste that much time.
Especially since if you tried to crowd source it, some of these fools would want to mark everything as AI just to make the function useless.
No.43867
>>43858I don't hate AI but I think we can tag the artist as AI generator so it will be easier to sort right?
No.43883
Just poison AI imagegens with CP and snuff, it's enough to get them banned from everywhere.
No.43899
>>43883 that's an horrible idea…
i love it we should do it
No.43900
>>43867Sure, but who does the tagging? How do you police the taggers to make sure they aren't trolling? How do you ensure everything gets tagged?
And of course you'd have to convince the people who write code for this site that they should care.
Seriously! Why should they care at all? You aren't paying them for this and their advertisers don't care either.
If you cannot come up with a good plan for the tagging there's no way they'll bother to spend time and effort on coding it. That's why it is the first step.
No.43911
I wish it were that simple, but there are Patreon accounts that use AI generated art and I don't think there's much that can be done about that.
No.43923
the best option would have been for patreon to ban AI "Art" resell, simple as that, if your account is discovered to sell AI shit, your account get instantly seized and any money refunded/taken from you
No.43928
I honestly can't fucking believe that Patreon hasn't banned it yet. It seems like something they'd do.
No.43943
>>43928You see, people pay for it, which makes Patreon money. They have no motivation to stop unless people stop paying
No.43950
>>43923A company focused on profit bans something that makes a shitload of money and has zero entry level. It's definitely going to happen.
That will literally only happen if you nuke it at the core and make every AI picture an indisputable legal landmine, which companies are so shitscared of they will ban it all before it even shows up.
You can do it for reaction videos and fat porn too, by the way. Watch Patreon's face when the feeders are literal overweight kids getting paid by horrible people to watch them get fat and the reacts are from very questionable slutty teens camwhoring for some odd reason
No.43958
AI should not be blocked, as it is not worth spending money on
No.43972
I follow artists and not browse random stuff, so this isn't an issue for me.
No.44026
While I appreciate preventing these thieves from also stealing people's money by having this shit up for free, it also really clogs up the main feed & probably eats away at server space as well as import time. I really do wish we could nuke AI content off here, but that's also impractical… There's no clear-cut solution and it may just be best to leave it.
No.44036
I just wish that patreon would force you to check a box that say "this account is making AI Art"
so it would be easily detectable, and could be filtered
No.44045
I feel like it should be tagged so as to be able to be avoided.
No.44050
Wouldn't it be simpler to add the option to filter artists and their work entirely? You have to hunt down and filter them one by one, sure, but it should be easier to implement than searching and tagging individual pictures.
No.44054
Agreed.
No.44080
Agreed 2
No.44309
Nah, I'd generate.
No.44320
>>44036What's stopping people from just clicking that box on non-AI content they don't like?
No.44342
he meant that the ai "artist" would be the one checking that box. But yeah, I don't think there's anything that would stop them from not doing it.