/kemono/ - kemono.party

there used to be a board on how to bypass those links, i dont remmber fully how to do it but replace the " "onfanbokkusuokibalab.net " with his fanbox link, try that

Bear with me. The way this idiot made the website is that he only allows requests when they have fanbox as the "referrer".
What this means that if you click the link in a fanbox page it actually works.
The fastest way to do this is to just… inspect his fanbox page ("https://box-fbx.fanbox.cc/") and change any <a> element "href" to the link "https://onfanbokkusuokibalab.net/c9fswjio0tdvqqp3gdm5pfsr/" or whatever link you want.
It's actually so fucking funny to be honest.

Pic related in case you don't know anything about html. Then you would just click the button.
I'm sure you can do it faster and in a cleaner way with a script but meh.

I have made a bad example. don't do it with the become a fan button, it has weird behavior. Do it with the social links like twitter instead.

>>39050
you need to be in that exact fanbox post

that referrer detect the actual post it got posted

>>39059
That's weird because for me, it always works as long as the domain is fanbox.
As proof, i have used an extension to spoof the referer and it works like a charm (pic related).
The extension is "Referer Control" btw, it's both on chrome & firefox.

>>39062
How does that extension fucking work? I can't for the life of me figure it out. I can copy and paste everything like your pic but then what? Where do I click, what do I open?

>>39074
That's it man. You just have to copy everything like what you see in the screenshot and the link should work. At least it does for me.
If you want an actual explanation what it does is it makes all request going to "onfanbokkusuokibalab.net" make it think they come from fanbox.com.
I have attached a rule that's probably easier to copy and does the same.

I personally found it much easier to just edit in a link in html of the post through browser developer console. Then browser did all the referer stuff by itself with no need for extension.

>>39077
Hmm you know its really weird I tried the "inspect element" method with the link in the OP and it worked, but using that referer extension didn't.
Maybe it's because I'm using opera and it doesn't work as good as chrome?

>>39124
Maybe you are using some kind of ad-block or tracking protection that completely removes the referrer.
Other than that i have no idea.
At least you can stick with the inspection method i guess