No.60941
>>60901bullshit
the admin is just a shitty coder
the site was literally made by jeets and chinks for $5 on fiverr lmao
No.60944
>>60941
> the admin is just a shitty coderi mean, creating a webscraper isn't that difficult, you can do it yourself actually (as if you're intelligent enough than neanderthals)
what makes it difficult is that ss designed their api endpoint to be trackable, the only logical way to avoid the detection is to have kemono scraper to scrape using same ip address as the session key holder
now you know the roadblock is, do you have a solution to this?
No.60946
>>60944TL;DR: Not that simple because not only the site has shitty design on purpose, it is extremely aggressive and dodgy for obvious reasons when you look up and find *who* actually hosts it (don't do it on surface web).
SubscribeStar very likely tracks the device ID, ASN and other fingerprints as means of checking this is the same user on the session. And if they're smart enough, removing false positives if an user happens to be using multiple devices that are completely unrelated (especially mobile+desktop).
Considering they have a large bunch of holes in their HTML (the framework is awful and security garbage, almost feels like it's a honeypot /s) you may be tempted to go for this instead but I wouldn't recommend it.
No.60947
>>60946device id is unreliable for them to use (since few browsers might send it differently, my android firefox sends as android 10 but on edge it's [REDACTED]) but as for asn it's what i meant
> for obvious reasons when you look up and find *who* actually hosts it (don't do it on surface web).i'm not doing research yet… are you saying ss was hosted by either mossad or cia/fbi?
No.61189
>>61168Homie forgot Yiff Party was a thing, there's always a chance the admin will just say
fuck it not worth it, gotta remember this isn't like youtube adblock race, if those platforms feel like it they can dedicate resources to find the owner of Kemono and take the site down for good by hitting them with legal action.
I feel like a lot of people keep bitching about the subscribestar import thing, and it sucks if you wanna see stuff from a guy that is there, but acting like you're in some reddit thread and try to shame people into making it work is just stomping your feet like a kid that didn't get what they wanted, I doubt that would make anyone working for the site more eager to get you what you want.
No.61192
>>61189Exactly this. I only see one way for kemono to make big bucks and that ain't ads even if you're rotating targeted ransomware and cryptominers.
The day SA goes fuck it or joins Meow, it's kemonover once again.
No.61203
>>61175>Someone needs to take out the ass-headed management that bans paying usersFUCKING OATH!
>>61188You will when Kemono goes bankrupt and the servers get turned off for good.
>>61189So you're saying that Kemono would rather go arse up than to attempt any solution on the SubscribeStar issue out of fear they'll be hunted down. Do these platforms even have the legal right to do that? Or are they really willing to resort to questionable means of getting what they want?
>>61192>The day SA goes fuck it or joins Meow, it's kemonover once again.It can only be "over" once, and that's when it's actually over.
No.61258
>>61234To think anyone would go to such lengths for that shit.
Desperate times call for desperate measures. If they're really gonna go that far, then we'll need to try and one up to level the playing field.
In other words… WE NEED A NEW STRATEGY.
No.61266
>>61258Making our own scraper? Hosting our own servers?
Breaking free from our chains and suffering?
We can deal with the guards. They're after kemono, not us. And we can even give them more than what SS offers them. All humans have a critical weakness.
No.61278
>>61275And who knows if the detection is fairly simple, like, if ip is not the same as logged ip = scraper, or if ip spoofing already done, they can check asn for immutability
no need to invest multibillion dollar of research, just have a good infrastructure (why they already had since they're a content platform anyway)
No.61302
>>61266I was thinking infiltration. Perhaps the right kind of person, with the skills needed to be hired for something (ideally a position that involves accessing the internal system, even better if it involves having full leverage over it), a good "reason" to be hired, maybe acts as normal for the first 1 or 2 years. Then implement something with a pretence that would secretly open a loophole to safely importing from SS.
Though there could be other ways as well. This is more of a "Mission Impossible" level idea.
No.61314
>>61302theorically, why would a hacker even bother to do this? could you give a solid reason that's worth for hacker's time?
it's more logical for a hacker to hack mit database or any uni database and spreading it for free or even doing malicious by leaking all US citizen SSN from a stupid company in handling private data and demand ransom
why would even hacker to bother hack… subscribestar.. for.. porn? what?
if you think a hacker could run program this program that and by miracle something hacked… that's not a hacker, that's a script kiddie
No.61342
>>61334sounds like too much dedication for… porn
also is that worth it for porn with risk of abysmal amount of lawsuit to a personal who initiates this bullshit?
also, imagining passed in the one shot selection is the most jobless mindset ever possible
No.61345
>>61344>>61323>you copied a file?>you're a…….. schizo retard!you're a kike.
and no, it's not because of your shitty english that i know you're a kike.
No.61397
>>61342>>61343Plenty of things, including unrestricted access to what may (sometimes permanently) be hidden from everyone else, privacy concerns and not compromising one's own transaction history, or getting sick of relying on cash paid gift cards (or just not wanting to be reduced to "picking and choosing" who to follow when you could have access to all).
>>61344The heading of this thread makes perfect coherent sense, and isn't a conspiracy theory unlike that other guy who himself probably has no friends and is just taking it out on the admins. This thread was made with the hope action can be taken that will benefit everyone, I don't think that other one would benefit anyone (not even it's OP).
No.61398
>>61397remember one thing
it is still only for porn
no matter how epic you're making it looks like
No.61445
>>61442
> more at stake than just porn.Patreon? Makes sense
SubscribeStar? Doubt. Nothing posts anything other than porn there.
No.61485
>>61445>Nothing posts anything other than porn there.False, people do post art and other stuff that isn't porn. I've seen artists who never (or in some cases rarely) do porn.
Also just remember SS is basically eating Patreon's lunch, so it's only a matter of time before it gets worse.