No.57355[Last 50 Posts]
Get that SubscribeStar importer sorted now! NOW!
It's getting to the point of no return! I need to see whatever the hell's going on behind that wall, I suspect that picture plagiarised off something I'd requested (and altered in a disgraceful manner, won't get into it, it's personal) is about to get a public release very soon, and unless I can stop the artist beforehand, the results will be ugly! Pressure is mounting in real life, I can no longer afford to go another month without it because I may not have that much time (but subscribing to said paywall is something I can afford less because it'll cost me my secrecy and my otherwise clean transaction history, I'm not the type of person who's either willing nor open to dealing with the consequences, some people are, but I'm not one of them). For me it's like a volcano of pain and suffering that's showing the earliest signs of an impending eruption, dogs are freaking out, I'm feeling the ground shake, smoke is visible from the summit, and I just know it's going to be ugly! Also I don't even need to name the artist since there are many people eager to import this artist once the SS importer is fixed.
No.57360
>>57355If that importer gets sorted now and that artist gets imported and that I'm able to see that picture, then contact the artist (and say one of his subscribers let me in on the plagiarism), I could gain leverage and prevent the picture from ever being released.
If the picture were to be publicly released, it will ignite a huge conflict that will spark a lot of pain and suffering and will see people harmed (or at least, unsaved).
Fix the importer, do NOT let that volcano erupt! Otherwise an entire community will go the way of Pompeii and Plymouth, Montserrat.
No.57361
>>57360>…and that I'm able to see that picture, then contact the artist…I was meant to say:
"…and that I'm able to see that picture and THAT I'M ABLE TO contact the artist…"
I wasn't instructing anyone to contact the artist, my bad.
Still, things are tense. Any help would be great, whether it's boosting this thread, or helping to give the admins a tap on the shoulder, or the actual admins doing something about SS, YOU COULD SAVE SOMEONE'S LIFE.
No.57427
>>57362>>57368>>57388>>57390>>57392>>57400None of you actually read it (bold of any of you to speak). This isn't really about porn anyway.
>SubscribeStar hasn't been imported in 2years what is this dude screaming aboutLooks like you didn't read it either. Or are you trying to use the amount of time that's passed as some sort of excuse? "Oh but if the admins can't get their shit together and work on a solution for long enough, then eugh it must be a good thing", time doesn't make things okay, it only enables further conditioning.
>Porn addiction ahh threadThis isn't even about porn, NOR addiction.
…
For fuck sake, it's a shame I can't get more specific about the situation without giving myself away to whoever in my community stumbles upon this (it'd be even uglier).
Also a shame this site has so many trolls and people who'll just bash people down for talking about anything they feel is cool to repress. It's people like you who make me hate coming here.
>Deranged entitlement syndrome.>touching grass ain't enough you actually gotta kill yourself manVery telling about the kind of people who come here. I never use that sort of language, not even on a bad day.
No.57435
>>57427If you want a SubscribeStar importer this badly, there are threads detailing how you can do this using existing github repos. Prepare to be neutered very quickly though if you use the repos without changing anything.
Scraping development isn't something you do overnight and it changes very fast as sites adapt. There is only one admin here, so if you don't have what you want, you need to DIY. It's that easy. Doesn't make it any better that people give away all the details on a board that is the #1 result on all search engines.
No.57457
>>57427Oh I read it, my dude
The fact that my IQ dropped by like 15 points and I feel spectacularly less intelligent now is proof that I did
But your blatant out-of-touch ignorance indicates to me you're either some kind of hyper-autist, or aspie, or this is your first day on the internet. Posting like this just isn't normal for anyone who knows shit about shit online. Like… literally no-one- LITERALLY no-one cares about you, or asked you about your life story… yet here you are, spouting some mock-grandiose bullshit as if you're the main character. It's not laughable, it's just kind of.. sad.
No.57616
>>57435That might help if you're a subscriber on SubscribeStar, but what if you're not?
As I said, I'm not the type of person who's either willing nor open to dealing with the consequences or getting my transaction dirty (which can lead to a possible bust of my secret in the future, whether tomorrow or in 50 years). I know that some people are, but I'm not one of them.
But hold up, I've seen people explicitly state they want to import said artist. And if that DIY method does work, then why hasn't a single SubscribeStar artist appeared in the 'Recent Artists' page over the past 2 years? To be fair there did appear to be some activity on Kemono's sister site Nekohouse, but all the importers on that site must be down since no artists have been added there since April (weird).
No.57618
>>57457Really I'm just trying to repeat what many many people have been calling for. Many people want it, many people have their own reasons, and I'm not just doing this all for myself. Also, I'm not the only one who cares, make no mistake about that.
As for my 50 cents, maybe I should highlight some of the things I said so can better understand where I'm coming from.
"I need to see whatever the hell's going on behind that wall, I suspect that picture plagiarised off something I'd requested (and altered in a disgraceful manner, won't get into it, it's personal) is about to get a public release very soon, and unless I can stop the artist beforehand, the results will be ugly!"
"If that importer gets sorted now and that artist gets imported and that I'm able to see that picture and that I'm able to contact the artist (and say one of his subscribers let me in on the plagiarism), I could gain leverage and prevent the picture from ever being released."
No.57619
>>57457"Otherwise an entire community will go the way of Pompeii and Plymouth, Montserrat." - (unsure if this was in part 1)
"YOU COULD SAVE SOMEONE'S LIFE."
If it isn't clear from these (conveniently ignored) statements, I'm trying to prevent a cataclysmic disaster from breaking out. This isn't a case of "main character syndrome" or "hyper autism" (and it's definitely not my first day on the internet, if it isn't obvious, did you really read it?), this is a cry for help. I genuinely can't stop disaster from breaking out unless I can defuse the situation first, and the only way I can defuse it is if I'm able to see what's on the other side of the wall (and see if my suspicions are correct, I'm 80% confident but I don't want to jump the gun, plus I can't work with a blurred preview), and the only way that can happen is if that artist is imported to Kemono, but THAT can't happen until the SS importer is sorted. Over 18 months went by without a working SS importer and I could afford to suck it up, but this picture is on the verge of coming out and is threatening to completely jeopardise everything (again, wish I could get more specific, but I have vultures to watch out for).
Do I want to come here and say "please get that importer sorted", even at the cost being ridiculed? Of course not, but I've been backed into a corner and it's the only chance I have of preventing that catastrophe.
No.57620
>>57619The story So far:
>OP thinks someone has copied/traced/edited something that they've made/requested.>OP is concerned that once it's released, something dire will happen.>OP wants to make a working scraper to make sure this image is what they think so they may take action now.>This is apparently so important that someone may die if this image is released.Okay, but if it's so utterly mission critical that it could involve someone's death, then you can afford to make a burner account and sub to them to check. Otherwise it's not a big deal.
>"But muh privacy!" Deal with it. If you think someone will die, then that's the risk you're going to have to take. We aren't some kind of personal army.
No.57629
>>57618>>57619I dont even understand what are these means
could someone summarise?
No.57685
>>57620>This is apparently so important that someone may die if this image is released.If the image is released then a conflict would break out that would alienate at least half said community for me.
Meanwhile in the future, I plan to release an update/video exposing a dangerous activity certain artists have engaged in that has countless people's lives at risk (the sort that involves encouraging people to spend money on commissions [or subscribe to their paywall site], have something appear on their transaction record that eventually leads to a bust, lives destroyed, unable to live without pain, suicides, you get the idea, all the while artists aren't informing their customers on what they're really getting themselves into, most artists might be stupid, some perhaps psychopathic, it's bad either way), and it's something I've been meaning to do for years but can only do when the time is right (again, wish I could get more specific, but I don't know if or who in my community might find this comment). The purpose of such video/update is to make people who haven't already made a commission in their life be fully aware of the consequences of doing so and think twice before proceeding (they should have the right to know).
As a result, it could save countless lives, BUT it can only work if word is able to spread through the whole community, and THAT can only work if I'm in relatively good standing with the online community as a whole. That picture could completely thwart that! And as a result, few if any lives would be saved, meaning most of whom I would save would be re-doomed. So yes, people could die.
No.57686
>>57620"Well if you're on a hot plate and standing up will get you caught on fire and prevent you from ending an form of injustice that is too often swept under the carpet, why can't you just sit down and get your arse burnt instead? Wouldn't that save lives?"
You'd think, but eventually somebody, possibly the artist who I'd originally requested would eventually notice the plagiarised picture and would inform me about how the picture I requested had been plagiarised (so I can't just pretend it doesn't exist). If it happens shortly after the picture's public release, and if I do nothing, he'll turn on me and call me out for not taking action on plagiarism despite me having a whole history of calling out plagiarism, which would certainly look rather odd. If the original artist instead only learns about the plagiarised picture a WHILE after it's release, he'll accuse me of keeping the plagiarism to myself, or worse, accuse me of secretly commissioning it possibly with an instruction to trace and add tiny changes as means of disputing the plagiarism claim (BTW I have seen a cropped preview of the picture a while back and judging from what I saw, it was done in a way that looked like the picture was made to mock and insult me, so definitely not me if there was any commissioner at all). Either way, many in the community would get the impression that I'm a really dishonest and ethically questionable person which would STILL lead half the community to be alienated from me.
No.57687
>>57620There's also the fact the original artist made no money from the original picture as it was a request, meanwhile the potential plagiarist has had his on SubscribeStar for over 12 months now and would undoubtably have made money from it (something the original artist would be very aware of and would likely want to at least be financially compensated for). So me not cooperating with the original artist would only add further fuel his anger which makes the odds of making those accusations against me much more likely.
So basically, if the picture gets released, I and many others would end screwed either way. The only difference is that the option of me calling out the plagiarist and getting smeared is the more humanly understandable approach, plus there is the slightest chance of justice being reached (though I wouldn't bet on it).
If the picture is prevented from being publicly released in the first place, then the whole timebomb would be defused. No alienation, no drama, nothing.
No.57688
>>57620>>57620"If all you need is a set of eyes behind that wall, why not ask someone who's already subscribed to take a screenshot and send it to you? Then you wouldn't need to beg for an SS importer."
Sounds possible, but;
1. How would I necessarily be able to find out who's subscribed to that artist? Let alone be sure it's not someone who's taking a break who'd feel more inclined to just… ask the artist if there'd been plagiarism (the only answer I'd get would a block on all socials just for alleging such possibility)?
2. Even if I could, it'd be pretty hard to reason with someone like that considering the circumstances.
3. Even if I could do that, how would I be able to distinguish the subscribers loyal to said artist from those who wouldn't have a problem with being a bit of a rebel?
4. The only person who might be open to being a bit of a rebel might be none other than whoever had actively imported the artist's Patreon page while the artist was on Patreon, but of course the identities of all those who import an artist to Kemono is a highly guarded secret.
Believe me it'd be nice to take this approach and not need Kemono, but I just can't see it working.
What a situation, am I right!
No.57690
>>57427Faggot. It's a piracy site. You get shit for free there from people who donate their passwords and time out of the goodness of their heart. Not your fucking personal army.
We have no care for you drama. If it was somehow that important to see some faggot shit on subscribe star, you would work at mcdicks for a month and buy access using a private subtle payment option.
Go touch grass, preferably kill yourself, fucking leech.
No.57692
>>57684>need to resort to suicideyou already do, faggot.
There are so many ways to pay for shit on SS that are private. jesusfuck leeches like you make me so unreasonably angry.
No.57693
>>57618>>57619'getting my transaction dirty'
Dude if you were even a little bit serious with this bait, and I might be falling for bait, but you can literally get a temp credit card.
Literally go to privacy.com, make yourself a virtual card, and use that to subscribe instead, get your 'proof' or whatever, then delete the virtual card and your entire account off of privacy.com.
The transactions will show as 'PWP*Privacy{Transaction date}' on your card, and that's it.
Make a plan, my dude, instead of coming here to wax melodramatically at a bunch of strangers in this strange tragic soliloquy, wrapped in Tolkien-esque prose
No.57700
>>57690/thread
literally OP is just a schizo
>MUH reputation>MUH transactions will get dirtyyou're just a coward who wants shit for free and was willing to make an entire history for it
No.57712
>>57693>oy vey pay us to be your proxy >we won't leak it at all and blackmail youJEW
JEW
JEW
JEW
JEW
JEW
JEW
JEW
JEW
JEW
JEW
JEW
JEW
JEW
JEW
JEW
JEW
JEW
No.57722
>>57712I'm black, and from Brazil
Good try though you smoothbrained fuckmook
No.57725
>>57693>Temp credit cardDidn't know that was even a thing. I could look into that, BUT if the next step is to move money from my bank account (etc.) to this "temp credit card", then THAT would come up in my transaction record (which would warrant a bust and eventual confession) which would defeat the whole purpose.
Unless of course such "temp credit card" already comes with a certain amount of money straight up (AU$20, AU$100 etc.), or if I'm able to walk into some place and transfer cash straight into said temp credit card without any need for ID or paperwork with sensitive information. Man I hope that's the case, but I've already got a hunch I'm in for disappointment. This is why I don't use crypto (not that anyone could pay on a paywall site with crypto anyway).
Oh wait, is this part below the catch? (antisemitic language aside)
>>57712>pay us to be your proxy >we won't leak it at all and blackmail youSMH I just hope I'm not required to put money into it or else that antisemitic clown might actually have a valid point (for once).
No.57726
>>57700>you're just a coward who wants shit for free and was willing to make an entire history for itI bet you get nicknamed Superman, because your ignorance as tough as steel.
>>57705>now i hope meow doesn't get around to making substar imported until you kill yourselfYou know those black pills contain fentanyl, right? You're already killing yourself so you'll go first.
No.57770
>>57619First things first OP, you're way too performative when talking, to you always talk like that ? if so, when someone from your community inevitably stumbles across this post they'll 100% know it's you because of how performative all this shit is, talking about Pompeii and giving such illustrative remarks.
>>57684wtf even is this secret ? lmao, it's a SubscribeStar artist, are you comming some loli shit ? jk, you're probably a furry.
>>57685Considering how you talk here you sound like someone with a lot of followers, you sure that if someone you know catch wind of your supposed crazy crusade they won't be be angrier at you using a site that steals from artists ?
If I had to make some guesses about you profile I'd say:
Effeminate male, on your 20's, autistic, has a following, might be an artist, but considering how you write I'd say you're a fanfic/indie writer guy that gets commission of your stuff, either that or you're just a commissioner and a bookworm, considering how you act you're probably liberal, and multifandom, I'd say the commission in question is related to either, Sonic, Deltarune/Undertale or Pokemon, or original OC stuff… Did I get anything right ?
Either way I'm quite interested now, I've considered going on twitter and searching for people calling out tracing and plagiarism to cross reference and check for someone that might be
known for calling out plagiarism and read their tweets to see if I spot your type of writing, alas, ain't nobody got time for that, you could be doing your call outs only on discord or whatever, Imma just lurk and see how this shit goes, you've got my attention.
No.57805
>>57770>I've considered going on twitter and searching for people calling out tracing and plagiarismDidn't do it there buddy. Also, really? Twitter's the first thing that comes to mind when it comes to art? It isn't even an art site. If someone talks about videos, do you suddenly think of Facebook?
>If I had to make some guesses about you profileYou got a lot of things wrong here. Such as:
>Effeminate, might be an artist, fanfic/indie writer, commissioner, gets commissioned, bookworm, multifandom,Couldn't be any further from effeminate. Also not an artist, not a writer, definitely not a commissioner (if it isn't clear already) nor do I get commissioned for anything, not the book type, and not "multifandom" either (I guess you mean people who are like, "Eww eLiGible_BeaTee doesn't like the new season of Fagfag's Adventures, everyone block them" or "I hope people like my Fagfag fanar- eww someone just faved 5 pics I made, I better block them". Because I've seen someone like that and I couldn't even try to DM him his home address was on display without getting blocked myself, pretty hopeless). And I'm not the OC type either.
>lot of followers, they'll 100% know it's youI don't have that high of a profile, not that it's any issue for me.
No.57808
>>57801No, it isn't pedo-shit. Rather it's something else which could often be described as something you wouldn't be able to independently conceptualise (not even on LSD), yet seriously-misunderstood by the few people who know it's existence. Whereas pedophilia is something known to everyone and is universally recognised as a form of evil.
The consequences still wouldn't be nice though.
No.57813
>>57808
> Rather it's something else which could often be described as something you wouldn't be able to independently conceptualiseOkay, this makes absolutely zero sense. Why the fuck would it impact your real life, unless it could be tied to you?
I would have guessed you commissioned art of someone you know IRL and are afraid they find out. Or you commissioned art of your OC from an artist that has been cancelled and you don't want to be tied to them.
If you think some artist posting weird avant-garde art will impact your life despite it not being tied to you in any way… you're completely schizo.
No.57817
>>57813
> If you think some artist posting weird avant-garde art will impact your life despite it not being tied to you in any way… you're completely schizo.Kompletely agreeen mein Freund! Mein Fuhrer for exampel, he was the best kanzler that was hated by amerikans but his wunderbar arts are wert von Millionen Reichsmark now!
卐卐卐卐卐 "Für das Vaterland" 卍卍卍卍卍
No.57840
>>57813No bro you don't get it, OP has literally the destiny of COUNTLESS people on his hands right now! THEY'RE OUT TO GET HIM! the EVIL DOERS will scour the internet and invade databanks to steal his information and if there's anything out of place at all they'll link it all to OP! And his image as the messiah of calling out plagiarism and the paragon of virtue of his community will be SHATTERED and he'll not be able to live without pain, and then commit suicide, followed by everyone else that matters in the WORLD!!!!
Jokes aside, this guy sounds too much like a schizo, but wouldn't it be fun if he was like, GaroShadowScale trying to stop someone from posting shit that might get him in trouble ? lmao, OP can you start naming yourself
GaroShadowScale when you post ? would be really funny.
No.57860
>>57812I've said too much. Plus anyone could just tell the artist beforehand and by the time I confront the artist about it, I'd be blackmailed into silence. Then of course the picture comes out publicly, the original artist finds the plagiarised picture, the plagiarist could then tell him about this in his argument, it wouldn't be good.
Eggshells man, eggshells.
No.57862
>>57813>this makes absolutely zero senseI'm not telling you what it is.
>I would have guessed you commissioned art of someone you know IRL and are afraid they find out.I NEVER have and NEVER will buy a commission, for the same reason I NEVER buy paywall tiers, the transaction history. Also there are no real life people involved in the picture. I wouldn't even attempt to request anything of a real life person.
>Or you commissioned art of your OC from an artist that has been cancelled and you don't want to be tied to them.As I tried to say in
>>57805 , I don't have any OCs and I'm not looking into that either.
Also, the artist in question isn't one on the verge of cancellation. Well, unless of course that picture comes out and I'm forced to expose him as a plagiarist, then he's on shaky ground. The problem is that he's actually a very influential one capable of fighting back with false accusations and having a better than even chance of winning. He'd be a winner not of a fight to see who's right but who's left. It's like David versus Goliath but if David dies either way.
I get that you don't understand, but the truth is that I wouldn't be able to explain the full story without revealing my identity. Besides, I'd rather you have the impression I'm some schizo and not get screwed, then to tell you everything and have you understand but at the expense of getting screwed harder by that bloody artist.
No.57863
>>57817Okay, when I started this thread, I didn't think there'd be Nazi trolls turning up.
>eugh eugh, mein Failure, nein neinYou sound like you're on the wrong thread.
No.57864
>>57831Troll.
>>57836Another troll.
>>57840*snoring*
>>57842This isn't the "issues" thread. Here's the link to it if you're lost:
>>57455>>57847As I just said a few minutes ago, the reason I'm not clarifying everything is because I don't want to get caught. Better you think I'm some schizo then for me to explain everything and make you understand the situation in full but at the risk of being caught. Sorry if it's all confusing, I can't do much about it.
>>57851Someone just got out of bed.
No.57898
>>57808Why is SS even allowed to function on the surface if it hosts snuff, bestiality and terrorist meetups among other things then? And how does Nekohouse not get their staff fully killed for properly operating an importer (not the public one)?
People aren't going to raid your home or smoke you in a drive-by shooting because you uncovered a mafia hideout unless you live in a shithole where journalists and whistleblowers end up with some meat on the pointy end of a stick and the rest of their limbs dispatched to family all while local police makes sure the job is done right. Governments certainly are shit for the most part but we're not yet there.
No.57905
>>57863
> You sound like you're on the wrong thread.NEIN! NEIN! NEIN! *stomps the floor menacingly* Ich bin NICHT ein troll! Somebody hat mentioned, ob die art you consume vould affect you indirekt wenn der artist behind it in trouble gerät und ICH gave ze example von meinen Führer!!!
\
\ o
[]\
—–
\\
\\
<<
Heil der Führer!!!
卐卐卐卐卐 "Für das Vaterland" 卍卍卍卍卍
No.57917
>>57915Resorting to cheap "kill yourself" insults now? Wow. So creative. NOT!
You people prefer to see a fellow man die than to help them? This is serious. I feel it bubbling up, scolding hot, trying to break through. It may at any moment! You have no idea the consequences this might bring not only to me, but to a whole slew of people.
When it does happen, you will see it in the news. And maybe think "huh, maybe they weren't so wrong after all!" I just hope you can live with the consequences.
No.57930
>>57915If you think I'm that stupid then you're in for disappointment.
>>57917>Resorting to cheap "kill yourself" insults now? Wow. So creative. NOT!Believe it or not, people have been saying that on this thread for years. It's just the worst of internet culture on display. I wonder if any of them have the nerve to say that to someone's face in real life.
No.57959
>>57917People literally tried to help you, you're assuming that anyone in this bum-ass forum is some kind of rocket engineer that could solve that shit anytime but don't care about it enough to do so ?
Also for someone trying to talk about a BUNCH of people being hurt, you surely don't care about it enough to compromise yourself, if you were open about what you wanted and had taken the deal from No.57777 you could save those people, but you don't care about that because you'd be putting yourself on danger in your mind, you're not on a spot to criticize anyone here for not being willing to save them even if there's no way for us to actually do that.
You're literally just acting like a entitled kid stomping your foot over not getting shit your way, your troubles do nothing to speed up the solving of this problem.
No.57975
>>57959Umm mate, that wasn't even me. That person (
>>57917 ) was someone else who I only just realised was pretending to be me.
Start over.
No.57981
>>57725No, that's literally what was already explained you you. The temp card draws from your normal account, but the transaction on your bank/normie card shows up as a generic message, but the person you paid only sees the fake card's details (you can input a fake name etc).
Literally the only way anyone would know what the transaction was actually for is if you're actively going around showing people your bank statement, pointing out the generic charge, and shouting "SEE THIS GENERIC CHARGE?! IT WAS ACTUALLY ME SUBSCRIBING TO AN ARTIST ON AN ART WEBSITE FROM SUCHANDSUCH FAKE CARD ACCOUNT! HOW SHAMEFUL AM I?!"
Which, granted, seeing how you're going about this makes me think that may be something you would do unironically? If you really want to keep your record clean, just go to any random store and by a Visa Gift Card with cash. Wear a Halloween costume or some shit to avoid being seen and recognized (since I'm sure that's your next attempt to get out of doing things). If even that is to risky for you, then it obviously isn't that important.
No.57985
>>57980Literally Kemono in 3 sentences
>>57355Every anon will know you commissioned furry ABDL coprophagia stroking each other's dicks while raping and killing toddlers. It's not a big deal, you'll live through it. It's drawn cartoons, man. Breathe in, breathe out, relax and move on.
No.57988
Even if Meow did get the SubscribeStar importer working (don't hold your breath), there's no guarantee that anyone will subscribe to and release the contents of the specific SS artist that you want, regardless of your opinions about "many people being eager to import the artist".
Also, if you know "many people" who are eager to import a given artist, then you know "many people" who are subbed to them. Privately ask one of them to share the details of the artist's recent postings.
If, as is more likely, you do not in fact know anyone that is subbed to a given artist, then you're just speculating about how likely they are to be uploaded here. The only guaranteed way for you to get at the contents of an arbitrary SS account is for you to sub to them yourself and take a peek. You've already been given ways to do so anonymously. If a single anonymous charge on your credit card is going to get you in trouble (with who, your parents?), then when you're asked, lie about what it's for with something slightly embarrassing but less damaging.
No.57994
>>57988tl;dr "I am once again asking for the SS importer" in a nutshell
Honestly I'm not pushing this far and one or more creators are deleting their pictures every X days on SS, hence the panic because they saw something they want but don't want pay for it.
Could be completely wrong but as you stated yourself, they can literally just subscribe themselves if it's that sensitive. They also probably have no idea how importing works if they freak out about just THEIR dirty secrets being exposed.
No.58049
>>57981>No, that's literally what was already explained you you.Huh
>…The transactions will show as 'PWP*Privacy{Transaction date}' on your card…For some reason I thought that part was a reference to "transactions on the VIRTUAL CARD", but no I now see I was mistaken.
>buy a Visa Gift Card with cash.>prepaid…Hmm, interesting. As long as I don't have to connect it with my bank account (etc.), and that I don't need to do anything ID related when it comes to purchasing or using it for the first time, then it MIGHT just work.
This almost sounds too good to be true, is there a catch? Or have I finally found a way to not only subscribe to paywalled artists but also make commissions for the first time. As someone who'd been looking for a breakthrough with getting around the latter for years, this could be a HUGE gamechanger. If so then I wish I knew this years ago.
If it is as good as it seems, then I guess these past few days of getting called a schizo might've been worth it after all.
No.58050
>>57980>Women owe me sexIs that you Andrew Tate?
>>57985Yeah whatever mate.
>>57988>there's no guarantee that anyone will subscribe to and release the contents of the specific SS artist that you wantI've seen people talk about it. I don't want to reveal how exactly I know, but trust me I do.
>Privately ask one of them to share the details of the artist's recent postings.It'd take the creation of an account on the site of people talking about it. I don't think any of the are subscribed at the moment, plus I can't just rely on word of mouth, nor be publicly seen asking to see a certain picture since that could lead to trouble further down (can't talk about how).
>If a single anonymous charge on your credit card is going to get you in troubleYou don't know what the future will be like (don't get me started on that).
>>57994>Could be completely wrongYeah you are. Sorry for the let down.
No.58052
>>58032>the amount of radiation in this thread making it feels like a second main thread lolI'm surprised this thread even made it to page 1, let alone hold for a week. Least I'm not being isolated.
>>58035>Hazmat suits are a prerequisite before we enter the chanI feel like that every time.