>>66827I'm not even defending, i'm just confused.
I mean, you're not doing any child a favor by banning a site they can't easily access, of which they already shouldn't be on.
And there's much, much worse topics, or more "intrusive" topics to be concerned about.
By the way, if that kind of art's so problematic, why isn't anyone condemning furry porn?
I haven't heard a single person condemn furry porn, when it's the precursor to the hypersexualized "200-gender" behavior, some of which is experienced out in public, in front of children.